Debutante Clothing :: The Deblog :: A vintage clothing and fashion blog for unconventional style where vintage, street and runway meet.

Debutante Clothing :: The DebLog

« Alligators, Old Mink & New Money | Main | THIS is why you should buy vintage, not rent! »

February 3, 2006

THIS is why you should buy vintage, not rent!

reese.jpgPoor Reese. Great choice of dress, too bad Kirsten Dunst wore it 3 years ago. Reese Witherspoon wore a vitnage Chanel dress to the 63 annual Golden Globe Awards. It turns out Kirsten wore the same dress in 2003! This is why you should buy it ladies! (Photo "© HFPA" and "63rd Golden Globe Awards®")

Posted by Sandra at February 3, 2006 11:23 PM | add to sk*rt

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.debutanteclothing.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/debutant/mt/mt-tb.cgi/13

Comments (1)

Oh too funny, you wrote about this. I thought the same thing at the time, when I heard about this. But then I felt sorry for her and thought, "Why do we have this prejudice towards people who've worn something someone else wore before them?" Is it because tacky magazines can layout the pictures side by side and poll people on who looked better? Is it because people want to be soo unique and original? I don't know, but I think in the case of celebrities wanting to wear one of a kind vintage, clearly their chances of being the only recent celeb to have worn a particular piece would be increased significantly by their buying pieces themselves. I ended up buying one of my Grandmother's dresses that Jennifer Aniston wore in In Style.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)